Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 08:00
Thank you.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
"Sixth sense" found in animals, changing science's view of sound - Earth.com
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Giant cable and satellite company closer to Chapter 11 bankruptcy - TheStreet
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Campbell’s Snack Business Struggles as Consumers Get Pickier About Food Spending - WSJ
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Research suggests Big Bang may have taken place inside a black hole - Hacker News
What’s next?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Rune Factory: Guardians of Azuma Review - RPGFan
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Russia can stop this any time.
The Webb telescope found something exceedingly rare around a dying star - Mashable
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.